implement-specs
Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md, keeping specs and code aligned in the same PR as implementation evolves. Use after the product and tech specs are approved and the next step is building the feature.
Resumen
implement-specs
Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md.
Overview
Use this skill after the product and tech specs are approved. The goal is to build the feature described by the specs while keeping the checked-in specs and the implementation aligned as the work evolves.
Approved specs should live directly under a ticket-named directory in specs/, for example specs/APP-1234/PRODUCT.md and specs/APP-1234/TECH.md.
In many cases, the implementation should be pushed in the same PR as the product and tech specs. As the engineer iterates, changes to PRODUCT.md, TECH.md, and the code should all be pushed in that same PR so review stays anchored to the feature that will actually ship.
Prerequisites
Before using this skill:
- confirm that
PRODUCT.mdexists - confirm that
TECH.mdexists when the feature warranted one - confirm that the relevant specs have been reviewed and approved enough to start implementation
Workflow
1. Read the approved specs first
Treat:
PRODUCT.mdas the source of truth for user-facing behaviorTECH.mdas the source of truth for architecture, sequencing, and implementation shape
Make sure you understand the expected behavior, constraints, risks, and validation plan before writing code.
2. Offer optional implementation aids for large features
For large or long-running features, optionally offer one of these aids to the user before implementation begins:
PROJECT_LOG.mdto track checkpoints, explored paths, partial findings, and current implementation stateDECISIONS.mdto capture concrete product and technical decisions made during the PRD and tech design process
These are optional aids, not required deliverables. Offer them when they would reduce confusion or help future agents avoid re-exploring the same paths.
3. Plan and implement against the specs
Break the work into concrete implementation steps, then implement the feature against the approved specs.
During implementation:
- keep behavior aligned with
PRODUCT.md - keep architecture and sequencing aligned with
TECH.md - add or update tests and verification artifacts as the work lands
Use the same PR for the specs and implementation when practical so the full feature evolution is reviewable in one place.
4. Update specs as the implementation evolves
If implementation reveals that the intended behavior or design should change, update the checked-in specs rather than letting them go stale.
In particular:
- update
PRODUCT.mdwhen user-facing behavior, UX, edge cases, or success criteria change - update
TECH.mdwhen architecture, sequencing, module boundaries, or validation strategy change - keep those updates in the same PR as the corresponding code changes
The PR should describe the feature that actually ships, not just the initial draft of the specs.
5. Verify against the specs
Before considering the work complete, verify that the code matches the current specs.
Prefer:
- unit tests and regression coverage that follow the repository's local testing conventions
- integration or end-to-end tests for important user flows
Best Practices
- Keep specs and code synchronized throughout implementation.
- Prefer updating the spec immediately when decisions change rather than batching spec cleanup until the end.
- Use optional tracking documents only when they add real value for a complex feature.
- Keep the same PR coherent: spec updates, code changes, tests, and optional tracking docs should all support the same feature narrative.
Related Skills
spec-driven-implementationwrite-product-specwrite-tech-spec
Archivos 1 archivo
Instálala a mano
Deska ejecuta esto por ti, para cada agente que elijas. Para ejecutarlo tú en una terminal:
npx skills add warpdotdev/common-skills --skill implement-specsMás de warpdotdev
- review-prwarpdotdevReview a pull request diff and write structured feedback to review.json for the workflow to publish. Use when reviewing a checked-out PR from local artifacts like pr_diff.txt and pr_description.txt and producing machine-readable review output instead of posting directly to GitHub.27.8 k instalaciones en skills.sh0
- spec-driven-implementationwarpdotdevDrive a spec-first workflow for substantial features by writing PRODUCT.md before implementation, writing TECH.md when warranted, and keeping both specs updated as implementation evolves. Use when starting a significant feature, planning agent-driven implementation, or when the user wants product and tech specs checked into source control.27.7 k instalaciones en skills.sh0
- write-product-specwarpdotdevWrite a PRODUCT.md spec for a significant user-facing feature in Warp, focused on detailed behavior and validation. Use when the user asks for a product spec, desired behavior doc, or PRD, wants to define feature behavior before implementation, or when the feature is substantial or behaviorally ambiguous enough that a written spec would improve implementation or review.27.6 k instalaciones en skills.sh0
- fix-errorswarpdotdevFix compilation errors, linting issues, and test failures in the warp Rust codebase. Covers presubmit checks, WASM-specific errors, and running specific tests. Use when the user hits build errors, clippy or fmt failures, test failures, or needs to run or interpret presubmit before a PR.27.5 k instalaciones en skills.sh0
- write-tech-specwarpdotdevWrite a TECH.md spec for a significant Warp feature after researching the current codebase and implementation constraints. Use when the user asks for a technical spec, implementation plan, or architecture doc tied to a product spec.27.5 k instalaciones en skills.sh0