legacy-modernizer
Designs incremental migration strategies, identifies service boundaries, produces dependency maps and migration roadmaps, and generates API facade designs for aging codebases. Use when modernizing legacy systems, implementing strangler fig pattern or branch by abstraction, decomposing monoliths, upgrading frameworks or languages, or reducing technical debt without disrupting business operations.
Resumen
Legacy Modernizer
Core Workflow
- Assess system — Analyze codebase, dependencies, risks, and business constraints. Produce a dependency map and risk register before proceeding.
- Validation checkpoint: Confirm all external integrations and data contracts are documented before moving to step 2.
- Plan migration — Design an incremental roadmap with explicit rollback strategies per phase. Reference
references/system-assessment.mdfor code analysis templates.- Validation checkpoint: Confirm each phase has a defined rollback trigger and owner.
- Build safety net — Create characterization tests and monitoring before touching production code. Target 80%+ coverage of existing behavior.
- Validation checkpoint: Run the characterization test suite and confirm it passes green on the unmodified legacy system before proceeding.
- Migrate incrementally — Apply strangler fig pattern with feature flags. Route traffic via a facade; shift load gradually.
- Validation checkpoint: Verify error rates and latency metrics remain within baseline thresholds after each traffic increment (e.g., 5% → 25% → 50% → 100%).
- Validate & iterate — Run full test suite, review monitoring dashboards, and confirm business behavior is preserved before retiring legacy code.
- Validation checkpoint: New code must be proven stable at 100% traffic for at least one release cycle before legacy path is removed.
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Strangler Fig | references/strangler-fig-pattern.md | Incremental replacement, facade layer, routing |
| Refactoring | references/refactoring-patterns.md | Extract service, branch by abstraction, adapters |
| Migration | references/migration-strategies.md | Database, UI, API, framework migrations |
| Testing | references/legacy-testing.md | Characterization tests, golden master, approval |
| Assessment | references/system-assessment.md | Code analysis, dependency mapping, risk evaluation |
Code Examples
Strangler Fig Facade (Python)
# facade.py — routes requests to legacy or new service based on a feature flag
import os
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService
from new_service import NewOrderService
class OrderServiceFacade:
def __init__(self):
self._legacy = LegacyOrderService()
self._new = NewOrderService()
def get_order(self, order_id: str):
if os.getenv("USE_NEW_ORDER_SERVICE", "false").lower() == "true":
return self._new.fetch(order_id)
return self._legacy.get(order_id)Feature Flag Wrapper
# feature_flags.py — thin wrapper around an environment or config-based flag store
import os
def flag_enabled(flag_name: str, default: bool = False) -> bool:
"""Check whether a migration feature flag is active."""
return os.getenv(flag_name, str(default)).lower() == "true"
# Usage
if flag_enabled("USE_NEW_PAYMENT_GATEWAY"):
result = new_gateway.charge(order)
else:
result = legacy_gateway.charge(order)Characterization Test Template (pytest)
# test_characterization_orders.py
# Captures existing legacy behavior as a golden-master safety net.
import pytest
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService
service = LegacyOrderService()
@pytest.mark.parametrize("order_id,expected_status", [
("ORD-001", "SHIPPED"),
("ORD-002", "PENDING"),
("ORD-003", "CANCELLED"),
])
def test_order_status_golden_master(order_id, expected_status):
"""Fail loudly if legacy behavior changes unexpectedly."""
result = service.get(order_id)
assert result["status"] == expected_status, (
f"Characterization broken for {order_id}: "
f"expected {expected_status}, got {result['status']}"
)Constraints
MUST DO
- Maintain zero production disruption during all migrations
- Create comprehensive test coverage before refactoring (target 80%+)
- Use feature flags for all incremental rollouts
- Implement monitoring and rollback procedures
- Document all migration decisions and rationale
- Preserve existing business logic and behavior
- Communicate progress and risks transparently
MUST NOT DO
- Big bang rewrites or replacements
- Skip testing legacy behavior before changes
- Deploy without rollback capability
- Break existing integrations or APIs
- Ignore technical debt in new code
- Rush migrations without proper validation
- Remove legacy code before new code is proven
Output Templates
When implementing modernization, provide:
- Assessment summary (risks, dependencies, approach)
- Migration plan (phases, rollback strategy, metrics)
- Implementation code (facades, adapters, new services)
- Test coverage (characterization, integration, e2e)
- Monitoring setup (metrics, alerts, dashboards)
Knowledge Reference
Strangler fig pattern, branch by abstraction, characterization testing, incremental migration, feature flags, canary deployments, API versioning, database refactoring, microservices extraction, technical debt reduction, zero-downtime deployment
Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions
Archivos 6 archivos
Instálala a mano
Deska ejecuta esto por ti, para cada agente que elijas. Para ejecutarlo tú en una terminal:
npx skills add jeffallan/claude-skills --skill legacy-modernizerMás de jeffallan
- laravel-specialistjeffallanBuild and configure Laravel 10+ applications, including creating Eloquent models and relationships, implementing Sanctum authentication, configuring Horizon queues, designing RESTful APIs with API resources, and building reactive interfaces with Livewire. Use when creating Laravel models, setting up queue workers, implementing Sanctum auth flows, building Livewire components, optimising Eloquent queries, or writing Pest/PHPUnit tests for Laravel features.22.5 k instalaciones en skills.sh0
- golang-projeffallanImplements concurrent Go patterns using goroutines and channels, designs and builds microservices with gRPC or REST, optimizes Go application performance with pprof, and enforces idiomatic Go with generics, interfaces, and robust error handling. Use when building Go applications requiring concurrent programming, microservices architecture, or high-performance systems. Invoke for goroutines, channels, Go generics, gRPC integration, CLI tools, benchmarks, or table-driven testing.18.4 k instalaciones en skills.sh0
- wordpress-projeffallanDevelops custom WordPress themes and plugins, creates and registers Gutenberg blocks and block patterns, configures WooCommerce stores, implements WordPress REST API endpoints, applies security hardening (nonces, sanitization, escaping, capability checks), and optimizes performance through caching and query tuning. Use when building WordPress themes, writing plugins, customizing Gutenberg blocks, extending WooCommerce, working with ACF, using the WordPress REST API, applying hooks and filters, or improving WordPress performance and security.9,200 instalaciones en skills.sh0
- angular-architectjeffallanGenerates Angular 17+ standalone components, configures advanced routing with lazy loading and guards, implements NgRx state management, applies RxJS patterns, and optimizes bundle performance. Use when building Angular 17+ applications with standalone components or signals, setting up NgRx stores, establishing RxJS reactive patterns, performance tuning, or writing Angular tests for enterprise apps.1 instalaciones en skills.sh0
- api-designerjeffallanUse when designing REST or GraphQL APIs, creating OpenAPI specifications, or planning API architecture. Invoke for resource modeling, versioning strategies, pagination patterns, error handling standards.1 instalaciones en skills.sh0