Skip to content

The Deska blog

Agentic Loops: Observe, Act, Verify, Repeat

Master the concept of agentic loops in AI software engineering. Learn how observe, act, and verify cycles power modern coding agents like Claude Code and Codex.

12 min read

The evolution of AI in software development has moved rapidly from simple completion to autonomous systems that function through agentic loops. Unlike traditional large language models that generate a single block of text based on a static prompt, an agentic loop allows a system to reason, execute a command, observe the result, and adjust its strategy. This iterative process is what transforms a chatbot into a coding agent capable of fixing bugs or refactoring entire modules without constant human intervention.

The Architecture of Agentic Loops

To understand how these systems operate, we must break down the technical cycle into its core phases. An agentic loop is effectively a closed loop system applied to software logic. It mimics the scientific method by forming a hypothesis about a code change and then testing that hypothesis in a real environment.

The Observation Phase

Everything starts with context. During the observation phase, the agent gathers information about the current state of the workspace. This includes reading file contents, checking directory structures, or inspecting the output of a previous command. Without a robust observation phase, the agent is flying blind. It relies on the tools provided to its environment to "see" the codebase.

The Action Phase

Once the agent has processed the observations, it decides on an action. In a coding context, this typically involves generating a file edit, creating a new directory, or running a terminal command. The sophistication of the action phase depends on the tools available to the agent. Some agents are limited to text generation, while others have direct access to a filesystem or a bash shell.

The Verification Phase

This is the most critical part of the loop. After performing an action, the agent must verify if the result matches the intended goal. If an agent writes a function to fix a failing test, it must then run that test. The output of the test becomes the new observation for the next iteration of the loop. If the test still fails, the agent analyzes the new error and repeats the cycle.

Comparison of Agentic Environments

Different environments provide different levels of support for these loops. The effectiveness of an agent is often determined by how much "surface area" it has to interact with your local machine.

Environment TypeObservation DepthAction CapabilitiesLatency
Chat InterfacesLimited to copy-pasteManual copy-pasteHigh
IDE PluginsActive file and contextFile edits and lintingLow
Dedicated CanvasFull workspace and shellsMulti-panel executionLow

While many developers use web-based chat interfaces, these lack a true agentic loop because they cannot observe the outcome of their code in a live environment. The user acts as the manual bridge between the AI and the compiler.

Technical Implementation of Agentic Loops

Implementing a loop involves managing the state between turns. In a standard API call, the state is lost once the response is received. To maintain an agentic loop, the developer must implement a system that appends the history of observations and actions to the context window of the model.

  1. Initialize the goal: Define what the agent needs to achieve.
  2. Tool discovery: Provide the agent with a list of functions it can call, such as readFile or executeCommand.
  3. Execution loop: Run the model, parse the requested tool call, execute it, and feed the output back into the model.
  4. Termination condition: The loop ends when the agent determines the goal is met or it hits a maximum iteration limit.

Role of High Fidelity Context in Loops

An agent is only as good as the information it can reach. If an agent is trying to debug a frontend issue but cannot see the browser console, the loop will likely fail. This is why integrated environments are becoming popular. By hosting multiple tools in a single workspace, you reduce the friction of the observation phase.

For example, coding agents like Claude Code or OpenCode perform significantly better when they have access to a terminal and a browser simultaneously. The ability to run a build command and then see the resulting error in a separate panel allows the agent to refine its next step with higher precision.

Deska and Local Agentic Loops

Deska provides a specialized workspace designed to host these agentic processes. Instead of a traditional linear IDE, Deska uses an infinite canvas where you can place various panels. This allows you to run multiple agents side by side, each with its own terminal and context.

Because Deska is a local-first application, the agentic loops happen directly on your machine. When an agent runs a command, it is interacting with your real files and your real filesystem. There is no remote sandbox that might differ from your production environment. You can use the Ask Deska feature to orchestrate these panels through voice or chat, effectively managing the high-level goals of the agentic loops.

Observing Multi-Panel Workflows

In Deska, the observation phase is visual. You can see a terminal running a server, a code editor with the source, and a browser widget showing the frontend. By placing these panels anywhere on the canvas, you create a dedicated cockpit for your agents. You can even use the mobile app to monitor the progress of a long-running agentic loop while away from your desk, ensuring that the verification phase is proceeding as expected.

Challenges with Autonomous Loops

While powerful, agentic loops are not without risks. An agent might enter an infinite loop if it keeps trying the same failing solution. Cost is also a factor, as each iteration of the loop consumes tokens.

  • Hallucination: The agent might believe a command succeeded when it actually failed.
  • Token Limits: Long loops can quickly exhaust the context window of the underlying model.
  • Security: Giving an agent access to a terminal requires trust, especially when it can run arbitrary commands.

To mitigate these, developers often use a BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) model. This ensures you have full control over your spending and privacy. Deska supports this approach, allowing you to use your own API keys for various agents while keeping your code and data storage strictly local.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are agentic loops in AI?

They are iterative processes where an AI model executes a task, observes the resulting environment change, and uses that feedback to inform its next action. This allows for autonomous problem solving rather than simple text generation.

How do coding agents use terminal access?

Agents use terminal access to run compilers, linters, and test suites. By capturing the standard output and error streams, the agent can verify if its code changes were successful or if they introduced new regressions.

Are agentic loops safe for local files?

Security depends on the tools used. Local-first tools like Deska keep your files on your machine, but it is important to monitor agents as they perform actions. Always use version control so you can revert any unintended changes made during a loop.

Modernize Your Workflow

If you want to experiment with agentic loops in a secure and flexible environment, you can start by organizing your workspace differently. Moving away from single-file editing toward entire workspace orchestration is the next step for developer productivity. You can download the Deska desktop app for Mac, Windows, or Linux to begin running your own agents in a multi-panel visual canvas.