The Deska blog
Custom GitHub Actions Written by Agents
Learn how to build custom GitHub Actions using AI agents to automate CI/CD workflows and improve developer productivity.
11 min read
The automation of software delivery pipelines has evolved from simple scripts to complex orchestrated workflows. Many developers now look toward custom GitHub Actions written by agents to bridge the gap between generic marketplace solutions and specific project requirements. Using autonomous AI agents to scaffold, test, and refine these actions allows for a more iterative approach to continuous integration. When an agent understands the codebase context, it can generate action logic that is more robust than a basic template.
The Architecture of a GitHub Action
Before delegating work to an agent, it is important to understand what makes up a GitHub Action. Every custom action requires a metadata file, typically named action.yml or action.yaml. This file defines the inputs, outputs, and the execution environment for the action.
There are three primary types of custom actions available to developers. Docker container actions package the environment with the code, which ensures consistency across different runners. JavaScript actions run directly on the runner host, which makes them faster because they do not require a container image download. Composite actions allow you to combine multiple workflow steps into a single reusable action.
Essential Components
- Metadata file: This defines how the action looks to the GitHub UI and what parameters it accepts.
- Logic implementation: This is the actual script or compiled code that performs the task, such as a TypeScript file or a shell script.
- README: Documentation is critical for reusable components so other team members understand how to implement the action.
- Logic for error handling: A well designed action should gracefully fail and provide clear logs to the user.
Why Use AI Agents for Action Development
Writing GitHub Actions can be tedious due to the specific YAML syntax and the nuances of the GitHub Toolkit libraries. AI agents excel here because they can reference documentation quickly and generate boilerplate code without syntax errors. An agent can verify that the inputs defined in the YAML file match the arguments handled in the source code.
This process reduces the cycle of trial and error that usually occurs when testing actions. Instead of pushing code to a repository and waiting for a runner to fail, an agent can help prepare unit tests locally. This ensures the core logic is sound before it ever reaches the GitHub infrastructure.
Leveraging Deska for Agentic Workflows
Deska provides an environment where multiple agents can work together on a CI project. By using the infinite canvas, you can place a terminal next to your code editor and a browser panel for checking documentation. This arrangement is particularly useful for building custom GitHub Actions because you can see the agent's output and the resulting YAML files simultaneously.
Deska allows you to run coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode side by side. Each agent can be assigned a different part of the task. For example, one agent could focus on the TypeScript logic while another handles the YAML configuration and documentation.
The Deska Workspace Advantage
The canvas workspace is non-linear. You can zoom out to see the entire project structure or zoom in on a specific terminal where you are testing your action logic. Because Deska is local-first, your API keys and source code stay on your machine. You simply use your own API keys through the BYOK model.
Using Ask Deska, you can use voice commands to open new panels or search for existing sessions. If you need to step away from your desk, the mobile app allows you to monitor the progress of a long-running agent task through a secure relay. This setup creates a tight feedback loop for developing complex automation scripts.
Step by Step Guide to Writing Actions with Agents
The first step is to define the goal of the action. You should provide the agent with a clear description of the input variables and the desired output. Once the requirements are clear, the agent can generate the directory structure.
- Initialize the project: Create the action metadata and the package.json if you are using JavaScript.
- Define inputs and outputs: Map out exactly what data the action needs from the workflow.
- Write the core logic: Use the agent to implement the functionality, such as interacting with the GitHub API or processing files.
- Add dependencies: Ensure the agent includes necessary libraries like @actions/core or @actions/github.
- Create a test workflow: The agent should write a .github/workflows/test.yml file to verify the action in a live environment.
Comparing Agentic Development to Traditional Methods
Traditional development of GitHub Actions requires deep knowledge of the GitHub Actions Toolkit. Developers often copy-paste from examples and modify them until they work. This often leads to bloated actions with unnecessary code.
Agentic development differs in approach by focusing on the specific requirements first. An agent can generate a minimal, optimized version of the action that only includes the necessary dependencies. While traditional methods rely on manual testing and documentation reading, agents can process these information sources in seconds. Both methods require human oversight to ensure security practices are followed, especially when handling secrets or repository tokens.
| Feature | Traditional Development | Agent-Led Development |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Slower due to research | Rapid boilerplate creation |
| Accuracy | Depends on developer | High for syntax and API |
| Security | Manual review required | Manual review required |
| Iteration | Manual trial and error | Automated testing loops |
Security Considerations
When agents write GitHub Actions, security must be a priority. Actions often have access to GITHUB_TOKEN or other sensitive secrets. You must ensure the agent does not output code that logs these secrets to the console.
Review the generated code for any potential injection vulnerabilities, specifically when the action handles user-controlled input. It is a good practice to use the Ask Deska assistant to double check the code for common security pitfalls before committing it to a repository.
FAQ
How to debug custom GitHub Actions locally?
You can use tools like act to run actions on your local machine using Docker. Alternatively, when using Deska, you can have an agent write unit tests for your JavaScript logic and run them in a terminal panel to verify behavior before deployment.
What is the best language for GitHub Actions?
JavaScript or TypeScript is generally preferred because it runs natively on GitHub runners without the overhead of Docker. However, Docker actions are better if you need a specific environment or language not supported by the default runner.
Can AI agents update existing GitHub Actions?
Yes, agents can analyze existing code and suggest updates for deprecated API versions or new features. In Deska, you can open an agent thread and provide the existing YAML and source files for the agent to refactor.
Start Building Smarter Workflows
Building custom GitHub Actions becomes significantly more efficient when utilizing AI agents within a flexible workspace. By leveraging the local-first architecture and the infinite canvas, you can maintain full control over your development environment while benefiting from the speed of AI automation.
Download Deska to start building your next CI/CD automation with Claude Code and other side-by-side agents.